Chevrolet Spark vs Mitsubishi Space Star
Chevrolet Spark vs Mitsubishi Space Star — Review & Rating Comparison
3D Models
Chevrolet Spark
Mitsubishi Space Star
Scores & Ratings
5.0User Rating
1 reviews
User Rating
—
0 reviews
7.0AI Score
AI Score
7.0AI Score
Pros & Cons
Chevrolet Spark
✓Well suited for dense urban driving
✓Relative reliability over time
✓Exceptionally low fuel consumption (approximately 18–20 km/l in the city) thanks to a modest yet efficient 1.4-liter engine
✓Reasonable interior space for 5 passengers, with a 170-liter trunk expandable to 500 liters
✗Relatively high maintenance costs
✗Expensive spare parts
✗Weak engine (98 hp) that struggles on inclines or in heavy traffic
✗Low build quality and cheap plastic materials that feel flimsy over time
Mitsubishi Space Star
✓Relatively cheap to maintain and fuel in dense urban areas
✓Convenient size for family trips in heavy traffic
✓Relatively large trunk for a hatchback model
✓Relatively low maintenance cost compared to the average car
✗Noticeable engine noise on highways
Which is better?
Both models score very similarly. The choice depends on your personal needs — review owner reviews and test drive both before deciding.
Want to compare other cars?
Our interactive comparison tool