Chevrolet Spark
✓Well suited for dense urban driving
✓Relative reliability over time
✓Exceptionally low fuel consumption (approximately 18–20 km/l in the city) thanks to a modest yet efficient 1.4-liter engine
✓Reasonable interior space for 5 passengers, with a 170-liter trunk expandable to 500 liters
✗Relatively high maintenance costs
✗Expensive spare parts
✗Weak engine (98 hp) that struggles on inclines or in heavy traffic
✗Low build quality and cheap plastic materials that feel flimsy over time
Chevrolet Spark — Common Problems →Peugeot 308
✓Good ride comfort on local roads despite the hatchback's compact size
✓Relatively modern design for its era, viewed positively by urban drivers
✓Effective air conditioning even in harsh local summer conditions
✓Modern and relatively spacious interior design for a fashionable option at the time
