Chevrolet Spark
✓Well suited for dense urban driving
✓Relative reliability over time
✓Exceptionally low fuel consumption (approximately 18–20 km/l in the city) thanks to a modest yet efficient 1.4-liter engine
✓Reasonable interior space for 5 passengers, with a 170-liter trunk expandable to 500 liters
✗Relatively high maintenance costs
✗Expensive spare parts
✗Weak engine (98 hp) that struggles on inclines or in heavy traffic
✗Low build quality and cheap plastic materials that feel flimsy over time
Chevrolet Spark — Common Problems →Skoda Fabia
✓Fuel savings in both city and highway conditions
✓Compact size suited to heavy traffic and tight parking
✓Exceptionally low fuel consumption (approximately 1:15) thanks to small, efficient engines
✓High reliability and impressive safety ratings (5 stars in Euro NCAP tests)
