Haval H6 vs Mazda CX-3 - Review & Rating Comparison
Quick verdict:Based on owner reviews and expert ratings, Haval H6 scores higher than Mazda CX-3. The Mazda CX-3 is more fuel efficient: 12.2-16.9 km/L for the Haval H6 vs 20.4 km/L for the Mazda CX-3.
Based on owner reviews and expert ratings, Haval H6 scores higher than Mazda CX-3. However, both models have unique advantages - consider the pros/cons based on your personal needs.
Common complaints about the Haval H6: Long-term reliability unproven; Limited service and parts network. Common complaints about the Mazda CX-3: Particularly high maintenance costs; Recurring electrical faults.
The Mazda CX-3 is more fuel efficient: 12.2-16.9 km/L for the Haval H6 vs 20.4 km/L for the Mazda CX-3.