Kia Stonic vs Toyota Corolla Cross
Kia Stonic vs Toyota Corolla Cross — Review & Rating Comparison
3D Models
Kia Stonic
Toyota Corolla Cross
Scores & Ratings
—
0 reviews
User Rating
3.0User Rating
2 reviews
6.8AI Score
AI Score
8.0AI Score
Pros & Cons
Kia Stonic
✓Agile and easy to maneuver and park in the city
✓Economical fuel consumption in urban driving — 6–7 L/100 km
✓Relatively high feature level for the price — touchscreen, navigation, and parking sensors standard
✓Distinctive and modern exterior design for the price segment
✗1.0 turbo engine (2017–2021) prone to increased oil consumption — requires checking every 5,000 km
✗Exceptionally small trunk — only 352 liters, limiting family use
✗Road noise and squeaking that appears after 30,000–40,000 km
✗Poor resale value — low demand in the local used-car market
Toyota Corolla Cross
✓High reliability even in dense urban driving conditions
✓Relatively low fuel consumption given the local fuel prices
✓Particularly low fuel consumption (around 1:15–1:18 per kilometre) thanks to the 1.8-litre hybrid or petrol engine
✓High reliability and low maintenance costs, in line with Toyota's reputation locally
Which is better?
Based on owner reviews and expert ratings, Toyota Corolla Cross scores higher than Kia Stonic. However, both models have unique advantages — consider the pros/cons based on your personal needs.
Want to compare other cars?
Our interactive comparison tool