Suzuki S-Cross vs Toyota C-HR
Suzuki S-Cross vs Toyota C-HR — Review & Rating Comparison
3D Models
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota C-HR
Scores & Ratings
4.0User Rating
1 reviews
User Rating
4.0User Rating
1 reviews
7.5AI Score
AI Score
8.0AI Score
Pros & Cons
Suzuki S-Cross
✓Suitable for urban traffic and the local mountainous roads
✓Relatively high reliability for the price
✓High reliability and relatively low maintenance costs for a Japanese vehicle
✓Relatively large cargo trunk (430 liters) for the small SUV segment
✗Limited customer service and garage coverage locally
✗Low spare parts availability during peak periods
✗The 1.5-liter engine is relatively weak (113 hp) and struggles on inclines
✗High wind and engine noise at speeds of 110+ km/h
Toyota C-HR
✓Well-suited to the local dense and hot urban traffic
✓Long-term reliability without exceptional breakdowns
✓Distinctive and modern design that stands out on the road
✓Low fuel consumption (averaging approximately 1:12–1:15 in urban driving)
✗Relatively high maintenance costs compared to other cars in the segment
Which is better?
Based on owner reviews and expert ratings, Toyota C-HR scores higher than Suzuki S-Cross. However, both models have unique advantages — consider the pros/cons based on your personal needs.
Want to compare other cars?
Our interactive comparison tool