Chevrolet Spark
✓Well suited for dense urban driving
✓Relative reliability over time
✓Exceptionally low fuel consumption (approximately 18–20 km/l in the city) thanks to a modest yet efficient 1.4-liter engine
✓Reasonable interior space for 5 passengers, with a 170-liter trunk expandable to 500 liters
✗Relatively high maintenance costs
✗Expensive spare parts
✗Weak engine (98 hp) that struggles on inclines or in heavy traffic
✗Low build quality and cheap plastic materials that feel flimsy over time
Chevrolet Spark — Common Problems →Honda Jazz
✓Comfortable for urban driving with relatively low maintenance
✓Surprisingly spacious for rear passengers thanks to clever design
✓Exceptionally low fuel consumption (up to approx. 1:18 in urban driving)
✓Surprisingly large interior space thanks to flexible cabin design and folding Magic Seat
